Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Non-Numeric (Qualitative) Data: Collect Your Own Data

Qualitative LibGuide to support data needs of students and researchers at University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Choosing a Method for Collecting Qualitative Data


Overall Purpose



  •  Quickly and/or easily gets lots of  information from people in a non threatening way
  • can complete anonymously
  • inexpensive to administer
  • easy to compare and analyze
  • administer to many people
  • can get lots of data
  • many sample questionnaires already exist
  • might not get careful feedback
  • wording can bias client's responses
  • impersonal
  • may need sampling expert
  • doesn't get full story
  • Understand someone's impressions or experiences
  • Learn more about answers to questionnaires
  • get full range and depth of information
  • develops relationship with client
  • can be flexible with client
  • can take ime
  • can be hard to analyze and compare
  • can be costly
  • interviewer can bias client's responses
  • Gather firsthand information about people, events, or programs
  • view operations of a program as they are actually occurring
  • can adapt to events as they occur
  • can be difficult to interpret seen behaviors
  • can be complex to categorize observations
  • can influence behaviors of program participants
  • can be expensive
 Focus groups
  • Explore a topic in depth through group discussion
  • quickly and reliably get common impressions
  • can be efficient way to get much range and depth of information in short time
  • can convey key information about programs
  • can be hard to analyze responses
  • need good facilitator for safety and closure
  • difficult to schedule 6-8 people together
 Case studies
  • Understand an experience or conduct comprehensive examination through cross comparison of cases
  • depicts client's experience in program input, process and results
  • powerful means to portray program to outsiders
  • usually time consuming to collect, organize and describe
  • represents depth of information, rather than breadth

Table was adapted from the Basic Guide to Program Evaluation,

© University of Nevada Las Vegas