Skip to Main Content
UNLV Logo

Editing a Scholarly Journal: Peer Review

This guide serves as a resource for editors of scholarly journals.

Peer Review

The National Cancer Institute defines peer review as:

The process by which original articles and grants written by researchers are evaluated for technical and scientific quality and correctness by other experts in the same field.

Recognizing peer review activity

Innovations

Finding Peer Reviewers

Finding peer reviewers

Journal publishers often provide advice to journal editors. These are some examples, but be sure and check with your journal's publisher as well.

Tips for finding reviewers

Publishers (such as the examples above) and others typically recommend the following sources for building your pool of peer reviewers.

  • Asking your board for recommendations
  • Using the reference list of the submitted paper
  • Previous authors in your journal
  • Use research databases such as Web of Science or Scopus
  • When someone declines an invitation to review, ask them for suggestions
  • Use the manuscript management system features to register reviewers by categories
  • Consider implementing a reviewer recognition option such as Publons

Peer Review Best Practices Resources

Peer Review Toolkits & Training

© University of Nevada Las Vegas